If the coelacanth is from the group of fish thought to have evolved?

There are, customary fact, NO fossil coelacanth because it's a rather modern species. That is, it's genetic code hasn't been stable, but has continued on change.

It is a myth that there are "living fossils" whose genetic codes have remained unchanged for millions of years. In reality, we experience that life continues on evolve and all of the common examples connected with "living fossils" are fallacious. For instance, modern cockroaches aren't breadth like the cockroaches such first showed relevant in the fossil record (which had six wings, among other things). Sharks are specially eroneous in this label, given the amazing all of evolution they've undergone. There were no hammerheads the time between the age connected with dinosaurs, for one thing.

The only affair that connects the Coelacanth on the ancestors of amphibians is the lobe fins. This doesn't make it any more a living fossil than the ray flipper on almost go fishing make THEM living fossils to the ancestors connected with the fish from which lobe-finned fish evolved!

As for your stereotype of evidence "proven false", not a bit connected with them stand. Miller-urey still shows such amino acids bottle form, which is all it was ever intended to do. "Darwin's tree connected with life" doesn't even represent sense, what are you talking about there? We shush have a tree of life, we just aren't beholden to Darwin because it. What "missing link"? Creationists enjoy been pretending such some link is missing, but they can't sound to bring to light all gap that menacingly needs filled. Haeckel faked some drawings, passing over nobody really cares but creationists. The be supported of us inspirit on. We have stacks of evidence without him. Archaeoraptor was forever considered good evidence and the fake was collar the moment a chemist prospect the fossil. Only creationists consider it relevant and only considering they badly need "bad evidence" that they can focus on rather of all the bluff of evidence that they cannot address (like hundreds of thousands connected with very non-missing links).